Navigating International Child Custody: The United States And India

NAVIGATING INTERNATIONAL CHILD CUSTODY: THE UNITED STATES AND INDIA

With the increasing globalized nature of business, cross-border families have become increasingly common. Unfortunately, when relationships deteriorate, the issue of child custody becomes not only emotional but also legally complex, especially when one parent relocates or removes a child to another country.

In recent years, U.S. courts have seen a rise in cases where one parent removes a U.S.-born child to India, sometimes in violation of an existing custody or visitation order. While the United States is a member of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980), India is not, creating a major legal gap in international enforcement.

This newsletter explains how the U.S. legal framework works under the Hague Convention, what challenges arise when India is involved, and what practical steps one can take to protect children caught in such cross-border custody conflicts.

I. UNDERSTANDING THE U.S. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A. The Hague Convention:

The Hague Convention is an international treaty designed to address cross-border parental abductions. Its goal is not to decide custody, but

• To ensure the prompt return of children under age 16 wrongfully removed or retained from their country of habitual residence and
• To establish which country’s courts should decide custody matters.

When both countries are members of the Convention, parents can file a Hague Petition through official diplomatic channels. Member nations are legally obligated to cooperate and ensure the child’s return to their home country.

B. Determining Jurisdiction in U.S. Courts:

In the U.S., child custody jurisdiction is determined by two key legal principles. Under both frameworks, U.S. courts typically defer to the jurisdiction of the country that represents the child’s best interests and stability.

The child’s habitual residence i.e., the country where the child is settled and acclimated, is crucial in determining which country’s courts should decide custody. Other critical U.S. laws the determine custody include,

• Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA): This U.S. law ensures that only one state (or country) has jurisdiction at a time to prevent conflicting custody orders. It covers issues such as initial custody determinations, continuing jurisdiction, modifications and emergency orders

C. Protections against International Abduction of Children:

To prevent one parent from removing a child across borders without consent, parties can through their attorney seek to build preventive measures into custody orders by U.S. Courts, including:

• Requirement for passport surrender.
• Prohibition of international travel without notarized consent from both parents.
• Appointment of a neutral third party or attorney to hold the child’s passport.
• Court approval for any international travel plans.

II. UNDERSTANDING INDIA’S LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A. Not a Signatory to the Hauge Convention:

Unlike the U.S., India is not a signatory to the Hague Convention and U.S. custody orders cannot be automatically enforced in India.

Separate litigation may have to be initiated in Indian courts under domestic laws to seek remedies as the court can chose to ignore foreign judgements.

B. Key Laws that determine Child Custody in Indian Courts:

Unlike the U.S., India’s unique civil legal framework has several legislations that concern and govern a child’s custody. Some key legislations include,

• The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (GWA): This Law applies to all religions in India and allows the court to appoint a guardian for a minor child if the parents are in dispute and/or unable to agree on custody.
• Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Indian Divorce Act, 1869: These Laws provide for custody and guardianship of children of Indian, Hindu and Chistian parents, respectively.
• Special Marriage Act, 1954: This law validates the child’s custody when the parents have undertaken a court marriage, or both the parents belong to different religions.

Indian courts have considered various factors including, the welfare of the child, the capability of the parents to care for the child, the child’s preference (if the child is of a certain age), and the child’s prospects either in India or otherwise (specially for cross border custody disputes).

C. Protections against International Abduction of Children:

Indian Courts prioritize the welfare of the child over enforcement of any foreign custody judgement. However Indian courts have applied the “Parens Patriae Doctrine” and even acted as the ultimate guardian to protect the child’s best interests. Other legal remedies include.

• Habeas Corpus Petitions: Filed before a High Court or the Supreme Court to recover a child unlawfully detained.
• Mirror Orders: Indian courts can issue orders mirroring U.S. custody judgments

III. SOMIREDDY LAW GROUP

At Somireddy Law Group, PLLC, we understand that cross-border custody cases between the U.S. and India require strategic coordination between both legal systems. Our firm provides,

• Representation in U.S. custody and enforcement proceedings.
• Legal guidance for preventing international abduction.
• Assistance in documenting evidence, affidavits, and travel restrictions.
• Coordination with U.S. embassies, consulates, and Indian authorities.

Our attorneys combine deep knowledge of U.S. family law and Internation guardianship principles to protect your child’s welfare. In a cross-border removal of a child to India, we can also work with your Indian attorneys on preserving your parental rights.

IV. Q&A

Being proactive before the child leaves the United States is critical. once the child is abroad, recovery becomes far more challenging. If your child has been wrongfully taken to India or you anticipate such a risk, timely action is crucial.

Q. I believe my spouse may abduct our child from the U.S. What preventive steps can I take?

A: Immediately seek legal advice from a licensed attorney Through whom, you can request passport restrictions or surrender orders in U.S. court or file travel injunctions or temporary restraining orders (TROs). You can also notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to flag potential child travel alerts.

Q. My Child has already been removed or abducted by spouse to India. What can I do.

A: With growing number of cross-border families such scenarios are not uncommon. You can through your counsel, file a custody enforcement or contempt motion in the U.S. court and retain an Indian attorney to file a Guardians and Wards petition or Habeas Corpus petition or seek a Mirror Order in Indian courts replicating the U.S. custody order. You can also contact the U.S. Department of State, Office of Children’s Issues for assistance.

Q. Can the U.S. Embassies intervene directly in India?

A: No. The U.S. Embassy can provide guidance and local legal resources, but it cannot interfere with Indian judicial proceedings.

Q. Can the U.S. Custody order be used to compel authorities in India?

A: No.  A U.S. custody order cannot directly compel Indian authorities to return a child.

Q. Can U.S. Law Enforcement help in the recovery of a removed child from the U.S. by a parent?

A: While we recommend approaching the authorities at the earliest when a child has been removed by a spouse, U.S. Law enforcement such as the FBI or even international agencies Interpol cannot forcibly remove a child from India unless there’s a criminal element involved, such as kidnapping or trafficking.

Q. Can my U.S Attorney represent me in India as well?

A U.S. attorney cannot practice or file petitions in Indian courts. UNLESS they are licensed in India as well. Often collaboration with Indian counsel is essential.

Q. What happens if both parents file in different countries?

A: Both courts may proceed initially, but ultimately, jurisdiction depends on the child’s habitual residence and welfare assessment.

Q. How can Indian courts help a U.S.-based parent?

A: They may allow visitation, video calls, or even temporary custody, especially if the child’s welfare Favors the left-behind parent.